Chapter 485: It turned out to have dug a hole long ago

Yes.
　　Poirot’s case is the most famous and the most talked about by readers
　　 is "Murder on the Orient Express"!
　　 In "Murder on the Orient Express", Poirot chose to let go of the murderer.
　　Because the law cannot punish the unpunished murderer, a group of people took up butcher knives and killed the murderer with a groundbreaking partnership.
　　 Fight violence with violence!
　　 After Poirot found out the truth, he hesitated for a long time, but finally did not report the group of people.
　　 Poirot’s handling at the time caused controversy.
　　 But in "The Veil", another murderer who cannot be sanctioned by law appears.
　　 This murderer uses the psychological weakness of others to encourage others to kill, while he stands far away and watches.
　　 can be called an extrajudicial fanatic!
　　 He even provoked Poirot’s friend Hastings to kill!
　　 If Poirot hadn't noticed it, Hastings had become a murderer.
　　 If Poirot cannot sanction the opponent, the opponent will only continue to go crazy.
　　 Under such circumstances, Poirot made the same choice as the group of murderers in "Murder on the Orient Express"
　　 Fight violence with violence!
　　 For good or bad.
　　 This behavior at least did not violate Poirot's personality, but made Poirot's personality stronger!
Yes.
　　He can forgive those people, because at the same darkest moment, he will make the same extreme choice!
　　 and the difference is...
　　 Poirot can forgive others for using violence to punish the murderer, but he cannot forgive himself for using this method.
　　 So after killing the murderer, he committed suicide without hesitation.
　　He is using his own way to die with the murderer!
　　 And this is precisely the greatness of Poirot!
　　 realize this.
　　 Many people are silent.
　　'S curse at Chu Kuang was also abruptly quiet.
　　 With the bottom line of that story, many people's comments are simply not true.
　　 It's just that everyone didn't expect it.
　　 It turned out that Chu Kuang had already shown this to everyone in "The Murder on the Orient Express". He was already digging holes.
　　The difference is that after the group of people used violence to control violence, they still want to live.
　　 Poirot chose to use death as his salvation.
　　 He felt guilty about himself.
　　 He violated the rules of his life.
　　 When he made this decision, he denied what he had adhered to most in his detective career.
　　 But this is Poirot!
　　 The significance of this layout is so profound that it can almost shock people!
　　 The seemingly unconnected story has formed a complete chain of thought because of two choices of the same thing with the same effect
Echoed around!
　　 And when making these two choices, Poirot was repeating four words.
"I do not know……"
　　 He doesn't know how to deal with others, and he doesn't know whether his choice is correct.
　　 There is no case in the world that can stump Poirot.
　　 What stumped him was only the contradiction about human nature.
　　 Can you accept this ending now?
　　 Readers don’t know either.
　　 But the curse did become smaller and smaller.
　　 The readers' riots gradually subsided because of the "Murder on the Orient Express" mentioned by Leng Guang.
　　 At this time.
　　 Suddenly someone said: "I don't support Poirot's approach, but this does not prevent me from continuing to love him. He will always be the king of detectives in my mind."
　　 seems like a chain reaction.
　　 More and more readers expressed their agreement:
"In the words of Poirot himself in the book, it may be his retribution, so in the end Poirot also fell into a distant reincarnation. When Fajin lost its meaning, Poirot raised the long-planned gun, and then represented what he thought The justice shot."
　　 "I love him more."
　　 "But this ending is indeed too cruel for Poirot. He has been pursuing the truth all his life, but in the final analysis he is still pursuing Fajin's justice, but he ended up in the most tragic way."
　　 "He is very old, he is still so wise, but his body can't support it anymore."
　　 "It is people like Poirot that make us stand in the sun all the time."
　　 "I really like Poirot!"
　　 "……"
　　 may still be controversial.
　　 But compared to the readers' crazy riots, everyone who has calmed down can already accept Poirot's choice.
　　 also accepted the ending.
　　 It is worth mentioning that when Agatha's "The Curtain" was released, she herself was no longer alive, so there was no incident of reader jumping.
　　 But...
　　 To use the reader's ridicule, it is, "Capital crime can be avoided and living crime cannot escape."
　　Chu Kuang’s ending is no problem, and it can’t change the fact that he gave the reader a knife in the finale.
　　 "This old thief is too bad!"
　　 "Totally tease us in the palm."
　　 "It is estimated that he is triumphant. Look, "Murder on the Orient Express" has already hinted at Poirot's ending, and Poirot will welcome his own salvation sooner or later."
　　 "I hate the old thief!"
　　 "Next time the old thief sends a knife, hold him down!"
　　 "Madan, this has become a stubborn stubbornness. Every time I watch a TV series or the like, I feel that the creator is going to send a knife, and there will be comments that hold the hand of the old thief Chu Kuang."
　　 "……"
　　 This is also true.
　　 The current Chu Kuang's image in readers' minds is a bit like the old emptiness of the earth.
　　Laoxu refers to the neon playwright and novelist Xu Yuanxuan.
　　Because the stories written by this man are more serious, and he has a strong ability to edit logical thinking, it will make people fall into contemplation and give people a kind of spiritual baptism, so the readers speak highly.
　　 However, success is also old and frustrated.
Although Lao Xu's works are wonderful, they basically follow the dark writing style, and they feel uncomfortable if they don't send out lunches, so that everyone has to keep a heart of fear when watching Lao Xu's works, because readers never know that they like it. When will your role receive lunch.
　　 Isn’t Chu Kuang the same.
　　 Readers never expected that Poirot would die at the end of "Detective Poirot"!
　　 How can he!
　　 How dare he!
　　 Poirot’s popularity ~EbookFREE.me~ belongs to the extremely high category among reasoning fans, and normal authors dare not play like this.
　　 He is so mad!
　　 It is not only the readers who feel exhausted physically and mentally, but many writers and editors in the industry feel very speechless
"so horrible."
　　 "This old thief yells not injustice."
　　 "I thought it was his limit to write Baguio to death, but he didn't expect him to write Poirot to death."
　　 "Baguio is not the protagonist after all, and he will die if he writes to death. He didn't expect that the protagonist would dare to start!
　　 "The point is that Baguio's popularity was not high before his death, and Poirot's popularity was at its peak before his death!"
　　 "Chu Kuang is really mad, and really arrogant, he really deserves to be a man in a fairy tale!"
　　 "Too fierce!"
　　 "Other authors have been cautiously to please the readers these days, but he plays with the readers' nerves every day."
　　 There were two reader riots in the novel industry...
　　 The first time was because of Chu Kuang, the second time was because of Chu Kuang.
　　
　　Ps: I want a monthly pass.
　　
　　Https://
　　 Only one second to remember the address of this site:. Mobile version reading URL: