Chapter 312: Law of Science and Technology Development

Regarding the technology of stealth, Liu Fan also said before in a short time that it is certainly impossible to popularize. This technology is too easy to be used by people with bad intentions. It can only be partially special before it can achieve perfect monitoring and management. The scene can be used.
Therefore, at this time, Liu Fan deliberately exposed himself in a way that was full of reverie and speculation. He really wanted to put pressure on some people. Anyway, he did n’t say it for a long time. thing.
You ca n’t kidnap yourself because you want to know. There are so many people who want to kill themselves. How could they succeed in kidnapping because of this?
There are so many big guys here in Silicon Valley this time to support the scene for themselves? Of course not. In fact, after the ban was lifted, Liu Fan found out more and more that there seemed to be more hawks.
Including this time they sent out to Huaxia, Liu Fan had received some news that they had come to put pressure on themselves. In that case, from the beginning, they had to take good care of the guests.
"Leaders, seniors, friends in the industry, friends in the media, and everyone in the audience in front of the screen, good afternoon." Liu Fan started with a smile and walked slowly.
"As the founder of the first global artificial intelligence inclusive conference, I am honored and grateful that I can get everyone's attention and even the presence of seniors in the industry. I noticed that many netizens have recently left online messages asking the global artificial intelligence inclusive conference What exactly is it, and what is the difference between him and the World Artificial Intelligence Conference?
In fact, everyone should have seen it literally. The biggest difference is the two inclusiveness. Inclusiveness has always been the core idea of ​​the development of our technology. .
So what exactly is Pratt & Whitney? I believe everyone will have their own understanding, but more understanding must be the price, the price that can be used by more people, I think there should be no problem in my perception, right?
Is this understanding correct? Of course, the first meaning of technology inclusiveness is of course price, but in our Mulong Technology's inclusive policy, in addition to this first-level meaning, inclusiveness has deeper meaning.
Today, with the opening of the first Global Artificial Intelligence Inclusive Conference and the special moments of the times, I want to explain to everyone the deeper meaning of inclusive benefits that Mulong Technology has been pursuing. "
When Liu Fan said this, many people's attentions were mobilized. Isn't the meaning of Pratt & Whitney the price, including the price that Mulong Technology has been referring to before? What is meaning will naturally attract everyone's special interest.
"To talk about this inclusive, we have to talk about the laws of technological development and existing contradictions.
Everyone knows that every technological revolution brings technological progress, but at the same time, it is also the obsolescence of old technologies. What is obsolescence is that this technology is no longer needed, or slowly no longer needed.
The first industrial revolution eliminated a number of manual manufacturing technologies and positions, the second industrial revolution eliminated a number of inefficient manufacturing technologies and positions, and the third industrial revolution eliminated a number of low-end manufacturing technologies and positions. The forthcoming fourth industrial revolution may directly obsolete existing manufacturing concepts.
But at the same time that the old era was eliminated, each revolution brought another thing, that is, monopoly, who seized the tide of the revolution and stood at the forefront of the revolution. When they succeed, they will usher in Long-term monopolies are like Silicon Valley, which monopolized the computer industry, because they led the third industrial revolution. When Liu Fan said this, he looked at the position where the Silicon Valley tycoons were sitting. "Look at who now dares to challenge Silicon Valley in the computer industry? No one can challenge, this is an absolute monopoly.
What if we want to break this monopoly? The way to achieve this goal with the greatest probability is the arrival of a new round of revolution. For example, if there are companies in countries outside the country that have successfully manufactured usable commercial quantum computers, they can even give relatively low prices, the monopoly walls of the traditional computer industry Will collapse instantly in a very short time.
Therefore, the process of technological development is actually a continuous process of the old era of technology and the old era of monopolistic enterprises being continuously eliminated, and the new era of technology owners to establish a new monopoly era.
Then everyone also noticed that I also mentioned the word contradiction in the beginning. Why should I say contradiction? Because for the law of scientific and technological development itself, this is actually benign, because continuous competition and replacement can promote better technology development, can promote technology to more unlimited possibilities, and can promote the development of the entire society and even Evolution of species.
However, since the second industrial revolution, technological monopoly has been accompanied by another type of monopoly, resource monopoly, and at the same time has given rise to an advantage, a wealth advantage.
To explain with a word we often hear is the gap between the rich and the poor. Now we can often hear people around us complaining that the age of being rich but not being rich is over, and the future must be the era of the richer and the poorer. Why?
Before the industrial era, productivity was low, resources were difficult to concentrate, wealth was difficult to accumulate, and the gap between the rich and the poor was not as large as imagined. Therefore, the poor have more opportunities to obtain counterattacks through their efforts.
It's clear when we look back at this problem for tens of thousands of years. At that time, people's lives depended on hunting. The wealthy people of that era were those who were physically strong, willing to go out to hunt more and master better hunting methods. Because their wealth is how much prey they capture.
Therefore, it is easy to get rich, exercise, sum up hunting skills, go out hunting, you are the rich of that era, it is easy for the rich to become poor in that era, and become lazy when they become lazy.
What about now? With the advent of the information age and the advent of global interoperability, resources and wealth are experiencing unprecedented concentration. I just mentioned that in order to break the monopoly of the old era, we need to rely on innovation in the new era, but now it is helpless. Innovators in that new era are often monopolies of the old.
But did the monopolies of the old times work hard? Of course, they also work hard. We cannot deny this, but are they hard enough? I put a question mark.
Why when Mulong Technology came up with a growth algorithm, friends in Silicon Valley also came up with a new algorithm, why when Muxin Technology came up with a living water architecture, friends in Silicon Valley also came up with a new structure, why since Mulong Technology After jumping out, it seems that the world has ushered in an unprecedented technology explosion within a few years?
Technology reserves are on the one hand, but on the other hand, is it because the monopolist has not worked so hard? Or use your energy elsewhere.
In the past, the monopolies of the old era did not work hard, and naturally the innovators of the new era seized the opportunity to replace them. However, in order to stabilize their status, the current technology monopolies have even reached more and more Agreement, everyone continues to deepen the 28th theorem and put more energy on how to stabilize their position ~ EbookFREE.me ~ With the development of technology, it is easier for monopolists to destroy the competitive environment, cut off resources and Normal transmission of wealth.
Because of lack of resources and wealth, many harder and more creative people will inevitably be unable to let the world see their talents, and the world will not be able to develop faster. So is the development of science and technology slowing down because of the monopolies of the old times?
I question this.
But if my doubts do exist, then I personally think that this should not be an additional result that technological development should bring, because it will be detrimental to the development of the entire human race.
The author Liu Cixin conceived a picture of wealth concentrated in one's hands in his works. This setting has been questioned for a long time, but according to the current development, can we imagine that there will be no such exaggeration in the future, but wealth and technology Concentration is in the hands of 1%, and even less hands are possible.
Would it be a good thing if this really happened?
My answer is of course no, but as we mentioned earlier, in the process of causing excessive monopoly, we all have to admit that technological development has helped, because the development of science and technology has reached the point where it now makes monopoly easier As one of the leaders in the technology industry, I have told myself long ago that I need to re-examine technology.
What I want to tell you now is that I think technology is not wrong, because technology itself is a moldable tool. Technology can bring about a greater wealth gap. At the same time, technology can also reduce the wealth gap and bring more relative fair.
how should I do it? How does this have anything to do with inclusive benefits? Let's talk about it from a micro perspective, what is the manifestation of scientific and technological development ...