Chapter 397: False civilization

Chen Feng considered for about five seconds.
But in the end, he did not stand up to clearly support Yilun's point of view, and only said vaguely: "Dr. Yilun's analysis is reasonable, and it is consistent with my personal guess, but there is no conclusive evidence at present. Dr. Yilun said I saw some mysteries that everyone can’t see, that doesn’t exist."
"I just synthesized the results of my predecessors, and appended some of my own bold speculations to reach these conclusions. But since I customized the title of the book to "Mad Conjecture". It means that these theoretical knowledges are all my crazy Boldly speculate that you still need to work together to prove it one by one in the next years, or to falsify."
His words were very conservative and did not seal Ilan's point of view.
Of course, this again showed his madness.
He just admitted that the relevant knowledge in the field of physics and biology in the "Mad Conjecture Collection" is a conjecture that has not been strictly demonstrated.
Skip rigorous scientific experiments and give answers directly.
He looked bloated.
If you change your language like this, you will definitely be spitted out by saliva.
But the mathematics problems he solved in "Conjecture Collection" have all been checked.
One by one Chen's theorem check is being serialized in the top academic journals of mathematics at the rate of one episode a week.
A man who can achieve such achievements in the field of mathematics at the age of twenty-five, even if he seems nonsense in other fields, people will inevitably ponder for a while before questioning.
Yi Lun was obviously disappointed with Chen Feng's attitude, but he didn't say much. After almost finishing the question, he walked down and sat back to Chen Feng again.
"Mr. Chen, you are..."
After enduring for about two minutes, Ellen asked.
Chen Feng smiled and shook his head slightly, "The timing is not mature. You think about the problem from an academic perspective, but I can't just consider these. In the current era, social productivity is still insufficient, and there are still many contradictions that need to be resolved. For example, between countries , Between classes and classes, between skin color and skin color, and even between two adjacent regions in the same country, there will be contradictions higher than competition. Before these problems are resolved, neither ordinary people nor leaders can afford this matter."
Ellen nodded.
He got it.
In the past, he felt that apart from being a musician and a scientist, Chen Feng could actually become an excellent politician.
It seems so now.
He can always stand at a higher angle and look at everything with a more comprehensive view.
"It's because I didn't think about it. I thought it was a good opportunity before, so I made a hasty decision. Sorry."
Chen Feng shook his head, "It's okay, it better shows that you are a professional academic worker."
"It is a great luck for human beings to get the perfect leader like you."
"I have won the prize."
While the two were talking in a low voice, the semi-academic and semi-casual speech on the stage continued.
There are not many participants, but they are all elite scholars from all over the world, and there are some people who can speak on stage.
After more than an hour, Chen Feng heard another interesting argument from a social science and economics big guy.
He did not jump out of his professional scope to prove the existence of aliens, but completed a large-scale social experiment in five years.
Today is the day when his final report is published.
This meeting was also convened by him.
His social experiment contains two aspects.
First, invite up to 500,000 volunteers to participate in the experience in a remote town.
The content of the experience is the theme of simulated life, which is regularly launched. The title is "If the end of the world will arrive in ten years, one hundred years, or one thousand years."
Volunteers participating in the experiment range from billionaires to homeless people, and perfectly simulate a small social community.
In five years, this big man has held social experiments in the town as many as twenty-one times, focusing on the suspense of these three time periods.
Second, there are millions of large-scale questionnaire surveys, the content of which is consistent with the theme of simulated life.
These two aspects complement each other, one is theoretical calculation and the other is practical exercises.
The experimental results are very interesting, showing extremely diverse stereo feedback.
People's feedback shows great differences according to the difference in the years of the end of the day and the differences in the volunteers' own conditions.
Assuming that the end will be ushered in ten years later, the vast majority of ordinary people who accept the theme of simulated life and questionnaire surveys say that it is a matter of ten years later. You have to consider it, but at present it cannot be all in your life, you must solve the immediate Credit card bills, and then wait for a little more money, we must quickly store more bullets, and then go to a safe place in the countryside to stay.
If you are a bachelor, you may end up with the idea of ​​waiting for something to happen.
If it is a middle class, it will try to maintain its own business and career, still have to hoard guns and ammunition, and will try to form its own team.
If it is a big businessman of the upper class, then on the basis of the preparations made by the middle class, it will try to make more connections, and quickly pay for Musk to complete the research and exploration of space travel as soon as possible.
If you have a chance, you must get a boat ticket.
When this question changed to a hundred years later, people's feedback changed.
The bourgeoisie tend to ignore nothing directly, it is all after their own deaths, whichever one has managed so much, what should they do.
The middle class will probably add one more item, that is, keep no future generations, so that future generations will not suffer. As for yourself, try to spend all your money when you die.
The big bourgeoisie still sponsors space projects and remains enthusiastic about the future.
After replacing the problem with the millennium.
Most people's answers are straightforward.
A thousand years? what is that? What does it have to do with me? None of my ashes can be seen that day.
Just paying for the bills, work, and business in front of me is enough to burn my head. Will I take care of things after a thousand years?
are you crazy?
Chen Feng was not surprised at this result.
This is the normal mode of thinking.
When he crossed two thousand years before himself, his thoughts were similar.
Just living in reality is tired enough, how can there be time to control the flood after death.
But the scholar on the stage cited some interesting phenomena.
All walks of life have similar views on the end of the decade, but in the centuries and millennia, some people have shown obvious differences.
This group of people expressed that they should work harder, find ways to create more value, and try to do their best.
There are not many people who speak such words, but many differences can still be found.
For example, some big businessmen and politicians, these people will speak very beautifully, but they are so beautiful to reveal a strong hypocrisy, the essential intention is to obtain immediate benefits through self-packaging, such as money and reputation.
Some people's answers were more constructive, and they immediately started to use their brains and kept asking about what form the "end of the world" would come, how to avoid it, and how to confront it.
Most of these people are scholars and have to be very successful scholars.
The big man who made the speech finally summed up this way: "I spent five years to complete this social experiment, and the results are not optimistic. I think that when the crisis is far away, only food and clothing are worry-free, and have a considerable level of knowledge, and Only people with extremely noble personal moral qualities can consider a relatively vain sense of responsibility."
"But when the crisis is imminent, almost everyone will quickly fall into doomsday fear, we will see the collapse of social order, the streets will be filled with gunfire and flames, robbery will become a job, and similar lives will not be obtained Respect. Maybe our population has fallen by at least half before the real end.
The scholar's view is pessimistic.
Chen Feng, who has seen Doomsday scenes many times, did not refute him.
First of all, the doomsday assumed by this scholar does not actually exist.
According to his description, this is above all an irresistible end.
However, the fact that Chen Feng sees in the future proves that when technology is sufficiently developed, everyone can afford food and clothing, and can all receive higher education, and people do not need to plunder each other to obtain sufficiently favorable material conditions, as long as there is enough time After completing the psychological construction, even if it is facing the irresistible and predictable end of time, humans will still bite the bullet and want to try it, commonly known as the Yellow River is not dead.
In addition, the economist from Oxford University made another mistake.
The locations of his experiments and questionnaires are limited to Europe and North America. The vast majority of people surveyed are native English speakers.
This scholar neglected the Chinese population, which accounts for one-fifth of the world's total population.
Therefore, his large-scale social experiment, which seems to have great reference significance, is actually biased.
Chen Feng intuitively believes that people who take the same question to Chinese native speakers may get completely different answers.
The development of a person's three outlooks is highly related to the environment and education he has been exposed to since childhood, and it also has a great relationship with the type of mother tongue.
Human thinking needs to be built on the medium of language.
The truth and philosophy in the human mind are not nihilistic concepts, but should also be self-summarizing theories built on different language structures.
These theories constitute a person's code of conduct and will determine the direction of his thinking and decision-making when facing each choice.
When people of different native languages ​​face the same problem, it is easy to present completely different coping styles.
Chinese and other language families show great differences in pronunciation, text pattern, sentence expression, logical structure, and emotional expression.
Chinese is a fast language that favors accurate expression and is more specific.
English is a slow language that is biased towards extended metaphors and is relatively abstract.
Chinese speakers tend to focus purely on the present, which seems practical.
Native English speakers tend to focus on the future, and their knowledge is broad enough. Native speakers of English with high sentimentality tend to focus on the future. Therefore, scholars in Europe and the United States did not disappoint when they faced the "doom problem".
Unfortunately, the most people in this world are still ordinary people with relatively narrow knowledge.
Therefore, ordinary people who are native English speakers are easily immersed in the fear of abstraction, and have no time to think about any sense of responsibility.
According to Chen Feng's calculations, ordinary Chinese native speakers will show a big difference from ordinary English native speakers.
This is not to say that the ratio of native Chinese speakers can be changed, but the ratio for the future and the present will be much higher.
Because Chinese wants questions fast enough.
When a person's overall knowledge level is narrow, and the understanding of the nature of the world is not so deep and extensive, the fast structure of Chinese can make people think of the future more easily.
The slow structure of English makes people have to think more about collecting the information they need to collect at the moment, slow decision-making problems that need to be solved, that is, the repayment of credit cards and so on.
But on another level, Chen Feng's observation of the future also believes that whether it is a top Chinese scholar who is a native Chinese or English native speaker, he can actually look at the future based on the present.
When people in two native languages ​​reach their peaks in their academic fields, they no longer distinguish themselves.
The knowledge possessed by these people is perfect enough, and the world view is ambitious enough to escape their own limitations.
At this time, the influence of the mother tongue structure on people's feelings will be reduced to a minimum.
In fact, there is a new logical paradox hidden here.
Are people with more knowledge more ethical?
But in fact, it's not.
Knowledge can't cultivate morality.
Morality comes from the education people receive from childhood to adulthood, and self-learning in adulthood.
The enrichment of knowledge does not completely represent the noble morality.
It's just that people with lofty morality will add some extra sense of responsibility as a driving force when learning knowledge. This part of people will have a higher concentration of learning knowledge and a higher degree of desire for new knowledge.
Therefore, among the top scholars, the proportion of people with excellent moral standards is relatively high.
But this does not mean that there are no scumbags among scholars, and the case still exists.
Although Chen Feng thought this way, he was a little dissatisfied, but he did not stand up to refute the other party on the spot.
When the meeting ended, he took the initiative to talk to the professor Oxford.
He talked about his doubts in private, and invited the other party to return to China with him. He also came to such a social experiment in the Chinese native language department.
Professor Oxford had already given up on this idea, but he could not refute Chen Feng's doubts, only saying that the funds were limited.
"Don't worry about the funding, I'll do it. We skip the small town model social experiment and focus on questionnaires to try to come to a conclusion within a week."
Professor Oxford narrowed his eyes, "Mr. Chen, are you sure you want to beautify your motherland?"
Chen Feng shook his head, "So I invite you to come, not me personally. The final statistical result will also be entirely your responsibility. I will only look at it and never intervene, so it will be more convincing."
"it is good."
Chen Feng's eyes rolled and he decided to take care of his alma mater.
"Just cooperate with Jiangnan University in Hanzhou?"
"No problem. UU Reading www.uukanshu.com My team has not been disbanded yet, when will it start?"
Chen Feng blinked, "Now."
Some ordinary people seem to be very big things. At the current level of Chen Feng, it is actually a matter of three or two sentences.
...
Nine days later.
The base of the questionnaire in China is as high as one million copies, which is already of great reference significance.
Looking at the result in front of him, the Oxford professor was dumbfounded.
Chen Feng was very sorrowful.
There is no gap without comparison.
Although the vast majority of Chinese-speaking natives did not show a particularly clear tendency when facing the crisis of 100 years/thousands of years, they basically agreed to work hard, strengthen learning, and try to realize more self-worth.
Only less than 30% of the people showed that the obvious thing is not related to their own high.
As for the crisis after ten years, the performance of the Chinese Department here has not disappointed, and almost no Chinese people showed obvious violent tendencies in the face of this irresistible end.
Actually there are, but this violent tendency is more biased towards the "enemy" of unknown circumstances behind the end.
If it is really impossible to resist, most people tend to stay with their families at the last moment.
Professor Oxford was very dissatisfied with the results of the investigation, and accused angrily, "The Chinese are too hypocritical!"
Chen Feng did not deny, "This may be really hypocritical. But if 70% of people in a huge civilization are willing to be "hypocritical" and spend their lives in "hypocrisy", it has become a certain kind of It’s sincere to a certain degree. Isn’t it? The hypocrisy of merchants is to gain more immediate benefits, but the population of hypocrisy in China is so large, can our hypocrisy get more benefits? Even if it is true, you will Is it because of our'hypocrisy' that we put down our stereotypes?"