: Update later, talk about the issues you are arguing about.

When I woke up, it was more than four o'clock. Then I'm going to dinner at my aunt's house tonight, maybe playing cards or something. Update is late, I can't guarantee that there will be ..... There is a high probability that it will be gone today.
In addition, I would like to talk about Sakurai's statement. When I wrote before, I thought about whether it would be more objective, but then I thought that Sakurai's statement is a foreigner, and his point of view should be subjective and one-sided. . The author writes novels and uses the pen (keyboard) in his hand to build a world. There are all kinds of people in this world with different ideas and different perspectives ..... If you can do this step, you are a qualified person. writer.
When I wrote that passage, I wrote it from the perspective of Sakurai's current affairs (except for this passage, I didn't write where the Qing Dynasty was better). I personally think that only in this way can we perfectly shape the distinctive characteristics of the character and the conflict between the three perspectives. Of course, I'm far from that realm.
You see, Li Xianyu didn't think the Qing Dynasty was good. He always felt that it was the most tragic era in history.
In terms of character collisions, I think I'm fine. There is no Facebook in my character, whether it's a villain or a decent.
But it may be that the reader is too sane, or that my book is too poorly substituted, and you play at every turn. When you see something that is not consistent with your own point of view, it is immediately the author's problem. Said: Ah, the author you Manqing licking dogs or something ...
You don't have a soul to read like this (manually funny).
Then come to talk about my point, and briefly summarize the words of the Qing Dynasty, it was a dynasty that was very strong in the early period, weak in the middle period, and very tragedy in the later period.
No dynasty in China has such a tragedy. There is no Chinese after Yashan, and there is no Huaxia after the Ming Dynasty. Compared with the late Qing Dynasty, this is a pediatrics.
As for the layout issue, the Qing Dynasty was indeed the "largest" dynasty in China's history. The Tang Dynasty was not as big as him.
This is not what I said, it is what history says. Those readers who say that I have too much personal opinion look at history by themselves.
I didn't count the Yuan Dynasty here, so I put double quotes on it. Because the argument about the Yuan Dynasty was fiercer than the Qing Dynasty. Some people say that the Yuan Dynasty was not China, and China was just one of the many younger brothers it played. The Ming Dynasty just expelled them was the best proof.
Therefore, the territory of the Ming Dynasty was not as large as that of the Qing Dynasty, and it was much worse. After the Qing dynasty came to Beijing, he included both his original territory and the Ming dynasty's territory (this is an official history, not a private good).
It is also said that the Yuan Dynasty was Chinese, because the Qing Dynasty counted China, so why did the Yuan Dynasty not count as China.
I think it is mainly because the Mongolians were separated and the Manchus were assimilated (this private product, my personal point of view).
In fact, it was because the skin was at the end of the last chapter. Someone took it seriously ...
So I'm afraid I won't update anything today, you really think the book is over. It happened that everyone had a dispute about the Qing Dynasty, so I wrote a single chapter on this topic ... Rest assured, it's not over yet.
Finally, Happy New Year.