Chapter 213: . Is it a distortion of human nature or a loss of morality

The names of Song Jin and Wang Tie are also very interesting, one is gold and the other is iron, but they did exactly the opposite.
Song Jin never gave money. When he was wealthy, he never did anything like giving money. He was very iron. On the contrary, Wang Tie was a benevolent boy. He gave money everywhere. Despite the high profile, it was always true. Of gold.
In the "Topics" program, the two were also blushing.
What’s more interesting is that Song Jin, a real iron cock, relies on a mouth. He supports the view that if you have money, you should donate more. If you don’t donate, you should be rich and unkind. On the contrary, Wang Tie, the charity king, thinks that charity is Rely on voluntary, not persecution.
Many viewers who watched the show were posting barrage, but it was extremely lively. However, it was Wang Tie who had the upper hand. This is actually not unreasonable. This thing is originally something that is not clear, but Wang Tie’s identity And the behavior is obviously more convincing than Song Jin's simple mouths.
However, Song Jin didn't give it in vain. Finally, he suffocated one sentence: "The so-called poor will be good for one's own body, and the rich will help the world. Wang Yifan is also a money expert, but he does not want to help the world, just be rich and unkind."
This kind of show usually does not produce results, but it makes Wang Yifan, the client, watch it with gusto.
When Yang Jun went back, he was not in a hurry to post. The information he had was definitely heavy news, and the happier those people jumped now, the more painful it would be to slap their faces, so he doesn’t mind letting them jump more. For a while.
Looking at the charity manuscripts of the celebrity artists flying all over the sky, how much money they donated, how much charity they have done, and so on, and every manuscript is praised by many people, and then Wang Yifan, who is really doing things, actually Used by many people as a negative example of attracting attention.
For example, Song Jin directly opened a special talk show for celebrity charity, and the theme was Wang Yifan, a guy who "being rich and unkind".
Previously in the "Topics" column, Song Jin had opponents and would be refuted by others, but in his own show, it was his world, so he could say whatever he wanted.
Not to mention, Song Jin is still very good at catching the heat. His current episode of the show has received very good ratings, and the point is that many people actually praise him, saying that he is worthy of it. Dare to speak.
Song Jin was also complacent, earning money and fame, Wang Yifan is a good person.
......
"Why are hypocrites scrambling, and good ones deceive others! Is it a distortion of human nature or a loss of morality?"
At first glance, most people think that this title is a common exaggeration and similar to the article of a certain C shock department. However, it was an uproar at first glance.
"Recently, the Mansha Charity Night, the Charity Celebrity List, the Celebrity Income List, etc. have been released. It can be described as interlocking, star charity, media carnival, so the star charity bulletin is flying all over the sky. How much did you donate today? How much, too much donation, is praised, and less donation is criticized. For a time, all people set themselves as moral models.
Being poor is good for one's life alone, and good for doing good at the same time, it is a big excuse, a big reason, as if everyone is poor, so it is normal to only be good at one's own life, so you don't donate money and don't pay anything.
However, Da Zhe is conducive to the world. Probably in the eyes of most people, this Da Zhe is a rich person. How rich are celebrities. Are you embarrassed not to donate? You are the masters. Therefore, robbing the rich and helping the poor will be enthusiastic. It seems that taking the rich and helping the poor is doing good deeds.
The Mansha Charity Night, the Oscars of the charity circle, such a big name, but what kind of awards are awarded? Is it a donation? Tens of millions of donations, each person donated tens of millions, and then, all are moral models, all are examples of Daze and Jitianxing.
I remember that when Ms. Chen Man was being interviewed, she was asked if Wang Yifan, a billionaire director, does not do charity, is it for the rich and unkind? She said that the basic principle of charity is the principle of voluntariness. The author feels amused. Everyone can say this principle of voluntariness. However, Ms. Chen Man said no. Who compulsory donations? Who publishes donation accounts? Although this is a very pleasant move, it has made the scammers invisible, but it has also taken a very bad head. When charity also began to compare styles, the moral standard of judging the amount of donations is based on the true good. Sorrow.
Looking at a certain marketing account, I pointed the finger at Wang Yifan, a billionaire director. Oh, some people may ask, are you here to clean up Wang Yifan? That's right, my surname is Yang Mingjun and I'm a reporter. I'm here to wash Wang Yifan.
What I don’t understand is, why target Wang Yifan’s director? Just because he is a billionaire leader? Just because he makes a lot of money, he has become the target of verbal criticism and charity fundraising. Why does he have to agree? Isn't charity a voluntary principle?
There are also Song Jin and others. There is really a problem with obtaining this name. When did the gift of gold send real gold? It all depends on a mouth, who scolds whom.
What qualifications do you have? To paraphrase Wang Tie's words, he does not steal or snatch, and the money he earns by his ability pays taxes in accordance with the law, and his legal income naturally has the right to control.
I'm really not the headline party, "Is it a distortion of human nature or a loss of morality". It is not a catch phrase, but a real feeling. When you criticize Wang Yifan for being rich and not benevolent, do you know what he does?
In a place that you haven't touched, there is a ‘Yifan Primary School’ where there are countless left-behind children. There are books to read and free lunch to eat.
And when I asked how many schools you built and how much money you donated, someone who was criticized by you for being rich and unkind said with an embarrassment that he didn't know too much.
So the author found his charity agent. In the year "Lilac" was released, Wang Yifan took out a check for 5 million for the first time and told her that I was responsible for giving the money and you were responsible for finding a place. By the way, this Everyone is familiar with Wang Yifan's charity agent, her name is Lin Kexin.
Before and after, he donated 105 million. He has built more than 60'Yifan Primary Schools' in places you may not have heard of, and more than 10 schools are still under construction.
Therefore, it is this person who you call the rich and unkind, and provides a safe and bright place to study for thousands of children.
The Mansha Charity Night, a huge scene, tens of millions of donations, created hundreds of charity stars, praised by thousands of people, and thousands of drafts, according to you They donated hundreds of thousands by one person. Compared with Wang Yifan’s hundreds of millions of donations, are they not hypocrites?
This is the greatest sorrow, I can understand, really understand, because if they don't publicize, then they will be criticized as being rich and unkind sooner or later. After all, the lesson from the past is here.
Isn't this a distortion of human nature? Isn't it a moral decay?
In fact, this is not what makes me the most outraged reporter. What makes me most outraged is what I saw and heard on the road as the accompanying reporter for the Children's Charity Foundation's caring for left-behind children activity.
......
Finally, attach photos and information, there are pictures and the truth...
"