Chapter 1306: Theology and science

Due to some reasons, a large number of users suddenly cannot open the web page to visit this site today. Please keep in mind the domain name of this site EbookFREE.me (the first letter of literature + org dot com, EbookFREE.me) to find the way home!
It is a pity that there is no good code. The two have never been able to reach an agreement on this issue. Although Du Fei, the spectacles man, tried to explain and explain to Dr. Gallo a very novel world view extended from religious existence, it may be Gallo. The doctor was too "blunt" and in the end failed to fully understand its deep connotation.
Instead of those people before, the glasses guy may think that those people are too stupid to be saved, and live up to his expectations for fellow people, but that will die. Dr. Gallo made it clear that regarding the same problem, choosing A is not The representative did not accept or deny option B at all, but had different choices from different angles.
Regarding theology and science, [Schrodinger's cat] is close to theology, and it is proposed that human consciousness can substantially affect the material world, but this is not the idealist view that science strongly denies, but the problem is that Schrodinger's cat still It's really the death tortured by countless scientists.
"I'm very happy to know some of your statements about religion. If, as you said, religion is all for writing a good script. Then how do you explain science, I believe in science, science can prove it."
This is another nonsense. For scientists, their belief in life is to find the most amazing things, science, the ultimate truth, all the truth.
"Okay. Now it's my turn to tell you, dear Dr. Gallo, you said you believe in science, what is the meaning of this statement, do you want to say that you believe in a scientific conclusion?"
"I don't believe in scientific conclusions, I believe in everything scientific," Dr. Gallo replied immediately.
"I think you should understand that any scientific research has basic premises, scientists call it axioms."
Speaking of which, Dr. Gallo suddenly thought of infinite energy technology. Is there an axiom for studying infinite energy technology? In fact, scientists can hardly find axioms or axioms.
"As the best scientist, you should naturally understand this premise. Even if you don't know it, I will review it for you. The scientific system has a basic assumption. From this assumption, theorems and formulas are derived to establish the entire theoretical system. "
Dr. Gallo pouted his mouth. He naturally knew that classical physics assumes that space and time are uniform. This is an axiom, and it cannot be proved by itself.
In another example, the famous theory of relativity assumes that the speed of light is constant. This assumption cannot be proved by the author himself, but without this assumption, he cannot develop his own theory.
"This is like saying that 1 + 1 = 2 is the axiom of mathematics, but no one can prove that 1 + 1 = 2. If you want to use the entire mathematical system, you can only accept this axiom, in other words, you can only believe 1 + 1 = 2. "
Dr. Gallo nodded, the simplest way. Who said 1 + 1 = 2 could not prove it?
I'll give you an apple first, and then an apple, don't you have two apples?
"But induction is used here, the basic method of scientific research. This experiment can be done many times, but strictly speaking it can't prove anything. How many experiments do we need to know that these experiments are not special cases? Even if repeated many times How do we know that we are not partial? Is it possible to guarantee that the sun will rise from the east every day before?
As if housing prices around the world have been rising, can it be guaranteed that it will rise forever?
"You mean this kind of logical dilemma occurs because the inductive method itself cannot be proved. Scientists can only choose to believe it and use it, otherwise even the most basic scientific research cannot be carried out." Dr. Gallo found it very interesting. He had not thought about similar issues before, but he soon did other things.
Du Fei, the male eye, rubbed his eyes. Someone could have an academic discussion with him. It was really not easy.
He said: Not only the induction method, but also another basic tool of scientific research, the cause and effect ratio, cannot be proved. "
"Causality?"
"Well, I have always questioned the cause and effect rate: For example, the sun is shining on the stone, the stone becomes hot, so people say that the sun is the cause, and the stone is hot as the result, but I think these people only see two isolated The phenomenon cannot see the causal connection at all. Who can prove that this connection exists objectively, not just in the human brain. "
Dr. Gallo resolutely said: "Wait a minute, if you want to question according to your logic, I am afraid that no one can answer directly from ancient times."
"So Dr. Gallo, what do you think?"
"I think you want to point out that causality may be the subjective imagination of people. Really idealists, no wonder the Royal Society of Science wants to drive you out, you have been out of touch since the beginning." Dr. Gallo is a smart man after all, where Will not understand his thinking.
It is a pity that the two have never been able to reach an agreement on this issue. Although Du Fei, the spectacles man, has tried to explain and explain to Dr. Gallo a very novel world view extending from religious existence, it may be Dr. Gallo too. "Dull", and finally failed to fully understand its deep connotation.
Instead of those people before, the glasses guy may think that those people are too stupid to be saved, and live up to his expectations for fellow people, but that will die. Dr. Gallo made it clear that regarding the same problem, choosing A is not The representative did not accept or deny option B at all, but had different choices from different angles.
Regarding theology and science, [Schrodinger's cat] is close to theology, and it is proposed that human consciousness can substantially affect the material world, but this is not the idealist view that science strongly denies, but the problem is that Schrodinger's cat still It's really the death tortured by countless scientists.
"I'm very happy to know some of your statements about religion. If, as you said, religion is all for writing a good script. Then how do you explain science, I believe in science, science can prove it."
This is another nonsense. For scientists, their belief in life is to find the most amazing things, science, the ultimate truth, all the truth.
"Okay. Now it's my turn to tell you, dear Dr. Gallo, you said you believe in science, what is the meaning of this statement, do you want to say that you believe in a scientific conclusion?"
"I believe that it is not just that Ke Ran thought of infinite energy technology. Is there an axiom for studying infinite energy technology? In fact, scientists can hardly find axioms or axioms.
"As the best scientist, you should naturally understand this premise. Even if you don't know it, I will review it for you. The scientific system has a basic assumption. From this assumption, theorems and formulas are derived to establish the entire theoretical system. "
Dr. Gallo pouted his mouth. He naturally knew that classical physics assumes that space and time are uniform. This is an axiom, and it cannot be proved by itself.
In another example, the famous theory of relativity assumes that the speed of light is constant. This assumption cannot be proved by the author himself, but without this assumption, he cannot develop his own theory.
"This is like saying that 1 + 1 = 2 is the axiom of mathematics, but no one can prove that 1 + 1 = 2. If you want to use the entire mathematical system, you can only accept this axiom, in other words, you can only believe 1 + 1 = 2. "
Dr. Gallo nodded, the simplest way. Who said 1 + 1 = 2 could not prove it?
I'll give you an apple first, and then an apple, don't you have two apples?
"But experiments are used here to know that these experiments are not special cases. Even if repeated many times, how do we know that we are not partial? Before seeing the sun rising from the east every day, we can guarantee that it will also be from the future. Is it rising east? "
As if housing prices around the world have been rising, can it be guaranteed that it will rise forever?
"You mean this kind of logical dilemma occurs because the inductive method itself cannot be proved. Scientists can only choose to believe it and use it, otherwise even the most basic scientific research cannot be carried out." Dr. Gallo found it very interesting. He had not thought about similar issues before, but he soon did other things.
Du Fei, the male eye, rubbed his eyes. Someone could have an academic discussion with him. It was really not easy.
He said: Not only the induction method, but also another basic tool of scientific research, the cause and effect ratio, cannot be proved. "
"Causality?"
"Well, I have always questioned the cause and effect rate: For example, the sun is shining on the stone, the stone becomes hot, so people say that the sun is the cause, and the stone is hot as the result, but I think these people only see two isolated The phenomenon cannot see the causal connection at all. Who can prove that this connection exists objectively, not just in the human brain. "
Dr. Gallo resolutely said: "Wait a minute, if you want to question according to your logic, I am afraid that no one can answer directly from ancient times."
"So Dr. Gallo, what do you think?"
"I think you want to fail to reach an agreement on this issue. Although Du Fei, the spectacles man, tried to explain and explain to Dr. Gallo a very novel world view extended from religious existence, but it may be Dr. Gallo too" "Dull", and finally failed to fully understand its deep connotation.
Instead of those people before, the glasses guy may think that those people are too stupid to be saved, and live up to his expectations for fellow people, but that will die. Dr. Gallo made it clear that regarding the same problem, choosing A is not The representative did not accept or deny option B at all, but had different choices from different angles.
Regarding theology and science, [Schrodinger's cat] is close to theology, and it is proposed that human consciousness can substantially affect the material world, but this is not the idealist view that science strongly denies, but the problem is that Schrodinger's cat still It's really the death tortured by countless scientists.
"It ’s nice to know some of your statements about religion. If you said that religion is all about writing good scripts. Then how do you explain science? For scientists, I believe that these people ’s life-long belief is to find the most amazing ones. Things, science, the ultimate truth, all the truth.
"Okay. Now it's my turn to tell you, dear Dr. Gallo, you said you believe in science, what is the meaning of this statement, do you want to say that you believe in a scientific conclusion?"
"I don't believe in scientific conclusions, I believe in everything scientific," Dr. Gallo replied immediately.
"I think you should understand that any scientific research has basic premises, scientists call it axioms."
Speaking of which, Dr. Gallo suddenly thought of infinite energy technology. Is there an axiom for studying infinite energy technology? In fact, scientists can hardly find axioms or axioms.
"As the best scientist, you should naturally understand this premise. Even if you don't know it, I will review it for you. The scientific system has a basic assumption. From this assumption, theorems and formulas are derived to establish the entire theoretical system. "
Dr. Gallo pouted his mouth. He naturally knew that classical physics assumes that space and time are uniform. This is an axiom, and it cannot be proved by itself.
In another example, the famous theory of relativity assumes that the speed of light is constant. This assumption cannot be proved by the author himself, but without this assumption, he cannot develop his own theory.
"It ’s like saying that 1 + 1 = 2 is the axiom of mathematics, but no one can prove that 1 + 1 = 2. If you want to use the entire mathematics system, you can only accept this fruit and give you an apple, you are not Are there two apples?
"But induction is used here, the basic method of scientific research. This experiment can be done many times, but strictly speaking it can't prove anything. How many experiments do we need to know that these experiments are not special cases? Even if repeated many times How do we know that we are not partial? Is it possible to guarantee that the sun will rise from the east every day before?
As if housing prices around the world have been rising, can it be guaranteed that it will rise forever?
"You mean this kind of logical dilemma occurs because the inductive method itself cannot be proved. Scientists can only choose to believe it and use it, otherwise even the most basic scientific research cannot be carried out." Dr. Gallo found it very interesting. He had not thought about similar issues before, but he soon did other things.
Du Fei, the male eye, rubbed his eyes. Someone could have an academic discussion with him. It was really not easy. But I think these people only see two isolated phenomena, and can't see the causal connection between them at all. Who can prove that this connection exists objectively, not just in the human brain. "
Dr. Gallo resolutely said: "Wait a minute, if you want to question according to your logic, I am afraid that no one can answer directly from ancient times."
"So Dr. Gallo, what do you think?"
"I think you want to point out that causality may be the subjective imagination of people. Really idealists, no wonder the Royal Society of Science wants to drive you out, you have been out of touch since the beginning." Dr. Gallo is a smart man after all, where Will not understand his thinking.
Like Dragon Ball: The Age of Earth Awakening, please collect: (EbookFREE.me) Dragon Ball: The Age of Earth Awakening has the fastest literature update.