Chapter 251: ,debate

During this debate, follow-up travel notes continued to be published. This time, the content of travel notes began to involve the medical system.
In this travel note, Miss Kris first praised the Anglican Church’s charity in establishing a charity hospital. It also compared this with the performance of the French Catholic Church before the French Revolution. He also called on the Catholic Church in France to learn the lessons of the past and learn from the good practices of other churches, including the Anglican Church, and not to repeat the mistake of worshipping Mammon and being abandoned by God and the French people. (Mammon is the of wealth in some primitive religions in the Middle East. Later, after the Jews bloodbathed the land of Canaan, they demoted this pagan to the devil. In the Bible, said that a servant cannot serve two masters at the same time. One cannot follow God and Mammon at the same time.)
Of course, this passage made some British people very happy, but it also made other British people very uncomfortable, especially after seeing that Miss Chrissy took out 500 pounds in one breath to support the Anglican's charity. , They all wished to reach out through the newspaper and grab the hand of Miss Kriss’s money: "Ms. Kriss, kind and innocent, don’t you know the sinister heart? When it comes to worshiping Mammon, they are all Not inferior to the Catholic Church in France at the time. Only in one thing they surpassed the Catholic Church in France at the time, that is hypocrisy. Give them this money, and there may not be a pound in it for the poor, and all the others will be taken by them. To raise a mistress. It's better to just give it to me..."
But the next part completely changed the mood of these two types of people. Because Miss Chrissy began to describe the incredibly dirty British hospitals.
"The ward was damp and dark, it was like a grave. Although it was daytime, when I walked into this ward, it took a long time for my eyes to adjust. After getting used to it, my heart can't adapt at all.
Where is the ward here, it is simply a garbage dump. There was sewage everywhere on the ground, and blood-stained gauze was thrown on the ground in a mess, swarms of blow flies were nailed to it, when a caregiver walked past, there was a hum, those blow flies They all flew up, like a cloud of smoke.
Except for flies, mice can be seen running around everywhere. A patient, my God, is really terrible. His lower lip is missing a lot. It is said that it was terrible to be bitten off by a mouse at night.
But this is not the most terrible. What’s more frightening is that the doctors here also have no idea about hygiene. Their work clothes are covered with blood and other dirty things. The coarse cloth clothes are covered with dirty things and even produce a kind of leather. The luster.
What if a doctor dared to show up in our French hospital wearing such a dirty thing? Well, in the last war between us and the Austrians, I used to be a volunteer and, along with some other great women, helped take care of the wounded in our military hospital. There, let’s not say that we made ourselves so dirty. Even if we didn’t wash our hands in time, we would be scolded by the doctor. And the doctor, if he forgot to boil his scalpel seriously with boiling water, Dean Han Maier might kill him directly with the scalpel.
So I asked carefully if there were many infections, fevers, and deaths in the hospital.
In this regard, Mr. Owen, the executive vice president of the hospital, confirmed my suspicion. He told me that most of the patients who were sent to the hospital for rescue actually did not have much hope of returning to their homes in a healthy manner. Many times, before the patient is sent to the hospital, the family has prepared the funeral for him. As for the patients undergoing surgery in the hospital and seeing blood, none of the ten patients survived.
And the Deputy Dean Owen also told me that this is true of all hospitals in the UK, and even all hospitals in the world. There will be no exceptions. The level of British hospitals is already among the top in the world.
So I think about what I know about France, and think about my service in the hospital of the Italian Legion, where at least two-thirds of the injured will not have serious infections, and the remaining three-pointers. In one, more than half of the people survived. This is very different from what the Deputy Dean Owen said.
So I tried to ask: ‘Mr. Dean, have you read the article about how to avoid infection in The Lancet? ’
But it seems that "The Lancet" has very limited influence in the UK, so Dean Irving told me that he has not read the article on it. So I tried to use my own words to describe the above content to him. However, after all, I haven't studied medicine specifically, and I don't quite understand many points. So I decided to get someone to buy a copy of The Lancet and send it to Deputy Dean Owen.
After I got out of Ci'en Hospital, I immediately asked Mr. Pierre to help me buy "The Lancet" so that it could be given to Vice President Irving. Mr. Pierre reminded me that I could buy a few more copies, because the condition of Ci'en Hospital may not be an exception, and "The Lancet" obviously has no such influence in the medical field of France in the medical field of Britain. Therefore, most of the doctors and deans of those hospitals have never seen the papers I mentioned.
Facts have proved that Mr. Pierre's concerns are very justified. In the next few days, I visited several other hospitals in the UK, and found that the situation in each hospital was no different from Ci'en Hospital, including that they had never seen The Lancet.
After running a lap, I think Dean Owen should have finished reading the paper on The Lancet. An elder of my scientist wrote a foreword for this paper. He said that although the paper lacks theoretical evidence, it is just a reasonable conjecture. But because it has achieved very good results in practice, although the principle is still not very clear, it is still very valuable for promotion and discussion. I think the Deputy Dean Irving should also agree with this view, and will make some improvements to the hospital based on the above experience.
However, when I came to Ci'en Hospital again, I found that it was exactly the same as it was a few days ago, with no change at all. I've always been uncomfortable, so I went to the Deputy Dean Owen. Associate Dean Irving told me that he had read the article on The Lancet. Although the preface to that article was written by the great Mr. Lavoisier, the person who wrote this article was just An unknown person, and the whole thesis is all conjecture, lacking theoretical evidence, so he does not believe this.
I argued with him a few words, and then Deputy Dean Irving told me that the decision was not in his hands. And in the hands of Dr. James, Dean. And Dr. James is a board member of the British Medical Association. If I want to change the rules of hospitals throughout the UK, I'd better convince Dr. James.
Then I went to see Dr. James again. However, Dr. James was very stubborn. He insisted that the article in The Lancet lacked basis, and the data obtained by our hospital was completely unreliable. He even gave a high evaluation of the paper. Mr. Wasseter’s qualifications have all been criticized by him. He seems to suspect that we put forward such a ‘heresy’ just to corrupt the reputation of the British medical profession...
In short, Dr. James and I had a big fight, and he was finally kicked out. Of course I have to admit that in this, some of my words may have gone too far. But Dr. James is indeed too stubborn. He even disagrees with a small-scale controlled experiment based on French experience. Many people used to tell me that the British are very stubborn, and I don’t really believe it. Today, this statement may really make sense..."
As soon as this travel note was published, it caused much more controversy than any previous travel note.
The one who supported Miss Chrissy naturally attacked the Anglican Church and the Doctors’ Association in England, only cheating money and not caring about the lives of the people. The opposition to Chrissy attacked Chrissy and The Lancet from all angles.
Some of them accused Chrissy of bragging, a little girl, boasting that she had served in the military hospital, and that she recognized Lavoisier. "Does she have to boast that she often eats with Napoleon in the next article? ?"
Some satirize "The Lancet" actually believes in barbaric witchcraft.
Basically, the newspapers of the "English Press Union" stand against Kris, UU Reading www.uukanshu.com defends Britain's "medical dignity" side; and the "English Free Press Union" stands in support of Kris Silk side. But they don't seem to care much about the statement of "The Lancet". What they are more concerned about is the British system that always makes the people suffer.
Soon after, "The Sun" also joined in. In response to the "Times Review" questioning the identity of "Miss Chrissy", the "Sun" began to use its own expertise in digging privacy, and fully introduced to the British who this "Miss Chrissy" was.
Not many people know the identity of "Miss Chrissy" in Britain, but in France, at least in the literary and artistic circles, many people are very clear. So "The Sun" quickly revealed the identity of "Miss Kriss".
Then the British discovered that the ridiculous French third-rate novelist "Chrissy" and the "Bag Queen" they satirized was actually even more legendary than her own. She is the sister of France’s first ruling Napoleon Bonaparte and France’s greatest scientist Joseph Bonaparte. She once personally planted the flag of victory on the newly recovered fortress on the battlefield of Toulon. She served as Bonaparte. The general's sister participated in the care of the wounded soldiers, so the soldiers called them "the saint of Toulon." As for his recognition of Lavoisier, isn't it normal for her eldest brother to have friendship with Mr. Lavoisier? Also: "Miss Kriss can indeed often eat with the first ruling."