Chapter 322: Out of control and controllable

The development of this event was very smooth. More and more people began to enjoy this paralyzed self-satisfaction, and humans gradually formed a relatively stable biological chain model.
However, human beings are creatures of the same level after all. If they want to create a natural biological chain model within the same level of creatures, this itself does not conform to the laws of nature.
I can't guess exactly how they went from thinking they were successful to discovering this method is not reasonable, but during that time, I saw something very interesting.
Artificial intelligence was proposed in 1956, and it was a technical field that appeared simultaneously with computers during the third industrial revolution.
In the following ten years, the development of artificial intelligence and computers were comparable. To be more precise, the development of artificial intelligence was even faster and even became the hottest trend in the third industrial revolution. However, since the 1970s, At the beginning, the leader of this glorious third industrial revolution seemed to be hidden in the snow, slowly fading out of people's attention, and even when people talked about the third industrial revolution, they forgot about artificial intelligence. However, until now, artificial intelligence was defined as the technology of the fourth industrial revolution, but he was clearly a pioneer of the third industrial revolution.
The rise of artificial intelligence once again, a time point that many people will mention is that after IBM demonstrated their deep blue in 1997, artificial intelligence was once again moved to the center of the technological stage.
So what happened to artificial intelligence in the middle thirty years or so? If you search for this problem, you can see that the most mainstream statement is that after more than a decade of hard work, the first researchers who researched artificial intelligence found that artificial intelligence was too difficult to implement, and the actual development of artificial intelligence at that time was much slower than Everyone originally expected that many people even began to think that artificial intelligence is just an unrealizable concept.
The beautiful vision of artificial intelligence has been defeated by reality, and a large amount of funds have withdrawn from the field of artificial intelligence, which has caused artificial intelligence to be abandoned for thirty years.
However, this statement seems unbearable. As early as 1965, Joseph Weissenban developed the interactive program ELIZA, which can engage in dialogue on any topic.
In 1966, Shakey, the first universal mobile robot, was launched.
In 1969, Arthur Bryson and He Yuqi described backpropagation as a multi-stage dynamic system optimization method that can be used in multilayer artificial neural networks.
In other words, before artificial intelligence was abandoned, the development of artificial intelligence did not seem to be as bad as they said.
In addition, in the 30 years of silence, many achievements of artificial intelligence are not clear. For example, in 1986, there was the first driverless car.
Especially in 1980, Carnegie Mellon University designed a set of "expert systems" for digital equipment companies, an immature but logically clear and practical artificial intelligence system.
In the same year, Waseda University in Japan developed the Wabot-2 robot, a classic artificial intelligence robot.
In 1988, Judia Poll published the Intelligent Probability Method and achieved a major breakthrough in the research and development of Bayesian Networks. He also won the Turing Award in 2011. Rollo Carpenter developed the chat robot Jabberwacky this year and realized the interaction between machines and humans.
These AI achievements seem to be immature, but when I compare the development history of the Internet and computer hardware, I find that if we judge solely by algorithms, the so-called artificial intelligence explosion after this century is only an upgrade of big data and computing power. The bubble is booming. In essence, the current algorithms have not even jumped out of the algorithm logic of the 1960s.
It wasn't until the advent of Mulong Technology that there was a so-called breakthrough in artificial intelligence.
In other words, if there is no Mulong technology, the current artificial intelligence is not much smarter than the artificial intelligence of the 1960s, they just have better application scenarios and data resources than the artificial intelligence of the 1960s, so why now suddenly Began to advocate artificial intelligence, what was the original silence?
For this reason, I visited a lot of relevant scholars from Omega. I realized that there is a problem. Perhaps many people do n’t realize that in the recent years of science and technology wars, you can hardly hear the names of European companies, especially On the battlefield of artificial intelligence, Europe is like retiring.
But in the 1950s and 1960s, Europe was the most powerful cradle of science and technology in the world, so why did Europe fall to the point where it is today? Is it because Europe only focuses on manufacturing or because Europeans are lazy? Can they be lazy than Mi Chinese?
I later discovered that, to this day, there is still a view that prevails in Europe: the threat theory of artificial intelligence. Europe's attitude towards artificial intelligence is perhaps the most negative or even hostile in the world.
Then when I visited the country for a lap, I suddenly realized that as early as 1965, Herbert Dreyfus published "AlchemyandAI", which raised major theoretical questions about artificial intelligence research. Goode in "ConcerningtheFirstUltraintelligentMachine" Proposed the theory of artificial intelligence threat. It is believed that super-intelligent machines will surpass human control.
We can find a lot of similar historical facts, that is to say, the artificial intelligence threat theory is a mainstream idea that once prevailed in the Omega region.
And the majority of those who approved this idea were artificial intelligence R & D personnel. Until now, that generation of R & D personnel still think so.
One of the most mentioned words in threat theory is: uncontrollable. At this time, it is uncontrollable to think of what the monopolists do not like the most.
And since the 1970s, personal entertainment has begun to appear in large numbers. The low-cost entertainment access environment we mentioned earlier is going very smoothly. If I were a monopolist, I do n’t think I would risk accepting an uncontrollable situation in that situation. Things.
Now look back and see what's happening again in this century when artificial intelligence broke out again. I notice two things.
The first was the almost rise of small island nations in the 1980s, the desperate breakthrough of Korea in the 1990s, and the rapid development of China in the early 21st century.
When TittyTainment became popular in the West, this thing did not seem to achieve the same effect in the East. If you dig deeper at this time, you will find that the East is a regional environment affected by the thought of China for thousands of years. In the sedimentation of thought, there is a self-control that is understandable beyond Western culture that is only a few hundred years old.
The self-control power under this cultural influence is related to the inheritance of Huaxia thought, and it is related to the great love of Huaxia thought. For example, Huaxia people have struggled for their children and think that children are a kind of inheritance. A natural consciousness has already formed. But in the West, although they love their children, they will not sacrifice themselves too much for their children, but the Chinese people, including the small island nations and Koreans affected by Chinese culture, will also do the same.
The other is great love, a kind of sacrifice spirit of fraternity. Chinese culture can give everything to the country and the nation. In this respect, Western culture also has no similar precipitation.
Therefore, in these countries born in a different cultural soil in the East, they may have a temporary impact because of TittyTainment, but often they will regain control and break through the TittyTainment trap because of other things ~ EbookFREE.me ~ for In other words, TittyTainment is out of control in the East.
The second thing is that from the beginning of this century, Huaxia has implemented cornering overtaking in science and technology. One of the core technologies of cornering overtaking is artificial intelligence. The artificial intelligence that was abandoned by the West is now being developed by China. This is another kind of out of control, out of control of technological development.
So combining these two points, my further guess is that in the face of out of control, they realized that artificial intelligence is inevitable, and also realized that Orientals will not give back the stability they want under the TittyTainment trap, so continue to assume that I It is them, and I will definitely restart the artificial intelligence plan, because of the two options that are out of control, whoever will choose the one that is more likely to be controlled.
More importantly, once AI is under control, he will start another way to stabilize the monopoly.
And if all my conjectures are true, with my understanding of you, you will be able to see everything I can see. Therefore, for the wealth, Mulong Technology is the eye of the technology industry. They let your development go because you can bring the artificial intelligence they want.
But the premise is that you cannot get out of control, but today your preaching is revealing the signal that you are about to get out of control. Why do you do such a thing?
My guess is that you haven't found a way to fight wealth alone, but you urgently need a better environment because real artificial intelligence, right, real intelligence, may be coming ... "
Liu Fan still maintains a high degree of concentration and vigilance, but he looks at Carina's expression has really changed, "Who the are you?"
This is the third time Liu Fan asked this question this evening ...