This kind of attack is really tricky, because Jiang Cheng is not easy to refute their words.
They didn't say anything practical, they just used some imaginary things to belittle his theory, so Jiang Cheng couldn't directly refute the other party's words. He can't convince everyone by his mouth just how valuable his theory is.
Value is very ideal. Everyone has a different view. It is impossible to convince others by saying.
Only by taking out actual things can you convince everyone of the value of your thing.
Jiang Cheng couldn't catch everyone and tell everyone that my theory is very valuable and will have a great impact on the future.
No one is sure about the future, so Jiang Cheng could not immediately prove the value of this theory.
Jiang Cheng wanted to completely refute the opinions of those people, only to produce enough evidence to prove the correctness of his theory.
When the time comes, the value of this theory will naturally appear in front of everyone.
If his theory is verified, those people's words will not be self-defeating and he will completely win this debate.
Unfortunately, this theory is not that easy to verify. The research on dark matter has always been difficult for humans, and many experiments are quite troublesome.
In the field of thorough observation, it has always been difficult for humans to use experiments to thoroughly prove a theory, and dark matter is no exception.
Even if Jiang Cheng personally designed some ingenious experiments to prove his theory from the side, it will take some time to complete these experiments.
Now Jiang Cheng has left all these experiments to Yang Qianqian, even if he wants to be anxious, he can't be anxious.
Jiang Cheng will have to wait for a while before he can slap those people's faces fiercely.
The reason why those physicists dared to attack Jiang Cheng in this way is because they understand that the theory of dark matter is difficult to prove.
They are not afraid of being slapped in the face by Jiang Cheng, so they dare to jump out unscrupulously. If they knew that the experiment had been designed now, I am afraid they would not dare to say those words so blatantly.
Although Jiang Cheng can't directly refute their words, he can also tell everyone one thing.
History will always prove the value of this kind of thing, but it often takes a long time to wait.
Jiang Cheng quickly made a public speech in response to those who questioned him.
He wants to convince everyone that those who say this theory has no value are wrong, history will prove him correct, and this day will come soon.
I am here to tell a story about mathematics. This story is about a great mathematician.
Lobachevsky, a great mathematician, discovered that Rogowski's geometry is also non-Euclidean geometry.
Roche's geometry is completely different from the geometric system of the time, and even covers the original geometric system.
At that time, he was also given the same treatment as me. All mathematicians did not agree with his theory and believed that his theory was of no value to the development of mathematics.
Even many mathematicians at the time were vilifying him, saying that he had been dreaming about unrealistic things.
History is always surprisingly similar, and today I was again a candidate like him.
The Lobachevsky that Jiang Cheng said was a mathematician from the Xiong country. He suffered similarly to Jiang Cheng.
Lobachevsky discovered at the beginning that the fifth axiom of European geometry is too complicated. It doesn't seem like a complete axiom at all, but rather like a precondition.
The fifth axiom of Huan's geometry says that there is only one straight line that passes through a point outside the straight line and is parallel to the known straight line.
This is what everyone has learned when I was studying, and it is also called the parallel axiom.
Lobachevsky made an assumption at the time that at least two straight lines passing through a point outside the straight line are parallel to the known straight line.
Then based on this assumption, a complete geometric system was deduced, and this geometric system was called Roche geometry.
This geometric theory does violate many people's cognitions because where one can see this kind of imagination, it is nothing more than an imaginary thing.
So Lobachevsky was indifferent from the entire mathematics circle at that time, and no one recognized his theory at all.
Because European geometry is too deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, Lobachevsky's theory violates the old geometric system.
But in the end, Rogowski's geometry was proved that Rogowski's geometry is equivalent to European geometry on the unit circle.
This is actually caused by different curvatures, and both of them are actually correct.
At the last time, Lobachevsky was given fair treatment, but at this time he had already passed away for many years.
Jiang Cheng was questioned by everyone like him, not even a single person who agreed with him.
However, his experience was much more crippled than Jiang Cheng. He was directly persecuted by others because of his theory, so he lost his university job.
And no one dared to do this to Jiang Cheng in reality. The theory to attack him is already at the limit.
Jiang Cheng is better than Lobachevsky, only because his power is too big and too big to the point where physicists can't help him.
In terms of Jiang Cheng's current status, it would be good if he didn't persecute others for academic reasons. Someone else would come and persecute him. If he wants to target those physicists who question him, it is a very easy thing.
As long as Jiang Cheng speaks out and says to deal with them, someone will naturally find them trouble soon, and it is a simple matter to let them lose their jobs.
It's just that Jiang Cheng didn't want to do this. He believed that academic matters should remain academic, and it would be boring to involve other things.
So while he was waiting for the experiment to be completed, he could only use this method to complain for himself.
By the way, this is also a grievance to Lobachevsky's past years. I hope that more people will know this great mathematician and how much he has contributed.
When Lobachevsky was alive, he did not see a day when his theory was recognized.
He passed away with infinite regret, but time proved his greatness and gave him a fair treatment.
"In the end, history has given him not long enough, proving that he has made great contributions to the development of mathematics.
So I want to say here that history will prove it one day, because history is the fairest.
"Those who questioned me are just the same as those who opposed Lobachevsky.
"They will prove to be ignorant fools one day, and I believe that day will come soon.
"When the time comes, I will use the facts to draw their faces and let them know what the price will be."
