Chapter 872: . Controversial comments
-
The Director of Music Department
- Layman black
- 1442 characters
- 2021-02-01 06:37:11
At the end of the premiere of "Dear", almost all people on the scene were red-eyed.
In other words, "Dear" is an anti-trafficking film, but rather, "Dear" is a film that focuses on family affection.
Whether it is Tian Wenjun and Lu Xiaojuan, or Li Hongqin, what they show is the kind of love for children.
After watching the scene, many audience members suffered a kind of baptism.
Family affection is always the easiest to move people.
Wu Tianxiong is actually under a lot of pressure.
On the one hand, it is pressure from public opinion. In fact, it is very difficult to shoot anything new with the sensitive subject of "Dear".
The reason why Wu Tianxiong picked up this movie is actually because "Dear" jumped out of the sensitive topic of pure abduction, and extended the theme of the film to another level.
Fortunately, the audience's response was quite good at the premiere.
The schedule of "Dear" is not very high. In fact, the expectations for this movie have never been at the box office.
......
Netizen book case: "The story of searching for a child is just a big background. The psychological transformation of each character in the story is the biggest drama. The maternal love is irrelevant, and the legal principle is difficult to judge the human relationship. The solid script and the master Chen's skill in seeing the big, This film is far more than simply moving. The performances of a group of powerful young actors in the Mainland are also amazing. The final true story prototype is tears!"
Netizen Xu Xu Rusheng: "Crying from beginning to end. Thank you dear parents for not losing me, and I will definitely not lose myself."
Netizen Tao Tao Linlin: "The level of tearing is quite high, the whole film is full of tears, especially the first half. The director knows how to grasp the softness of people's hearts, and give you a blow at the critical moment. This is a very teary film. But it's just a tear-jerking movie. Just like the absent human trafficker, the film hides all the key elements and adds warmth. Especially the separation between the front and the back, and the excessive humanistic care."
Netizen Sanmi: "Watching this movie was moved by countless shots, and I couldn't cry without deliberately sensationalism. The director's ending to Li Hongqin was too cruel, and she couldn't bear to think about it anymore. She yelled, "Don't give it to children." Tao, he’s allergic to "My kind and great mother, there are thousands of roads away from home, and there is only one way home. I hope we are all on the only way. A super good movie!"
The rating of "Dear" on the audio-visual website is not high. Compared with the overwhelming praise of "I'm Not the God of Medicine", "Dear" has mixed reviews.
Score 8.1 points!
Such a rating is actually not high on the first day.
However, what is interesting is that there are quite a lot of comments on "Dear", whether it is good or bad.
The ratio of the number of ratings to the number of comments is actually lower than 10:1!
This shows the reliability of the rating of "Dear"!
Many movies are actually scored by people who vote with their feet, and many people have not even seen the movie.
But "Dear" is obviously not the case. The ratio of the number of ratings to the number of comments is so low, which also shows that many people come to rate this movie after seeing it.
And many viewers are very invested in the characters in the film.
For example: "The filming is very good, the acting skills are very hard, and it also allows me to understand the crowd more deeply. For me, the most touching part is the "encouragement of the mutual aid association!" encourage! Encourage and encourage! "In that period, I used self-anaesthesia to deeply infuse obsessions into my fragile will. I also hope that after the movie is released, Mr. Han's prototype can find his own child."
For example: "I really feel depressed after reading it. The son who was so close in the past finds a stranger who gets along with him. It is really helpless!"
For example: "Human trafficker's wife Li Hongqin had a cruel ending! The director did not say whether Li Hongqin really did not know that her husband was a human trafficker, which made this role more complicated."
Another example: "When Han Dezhong sang Qinqiang, I burst into tears. He took that as the biological father who loved the child deeply, and showed the inability to do anything after losing the child. But he is a big man. He can’t cry all day long, and there is a wife who needs support and comfort, so he can only put his affection in Qinqiang. That kind of resentment, that kind of self-blame spreads to everyone with the singing. But as a wife, he has heard it countless times. The one who was moved has been moved, and the one who should have cried has already cried. The child is naturally gone, so she irritated to leave, which hit Han Dezhong even more. President Han is the saddest one in the whole film!"
In some movies, many people may praise the plot or special effects.
But in "Dear", many people focus on those characters in the movie.
Li Hongqin, Tian Wenjun, Lu Xiaojuan, Han Dezhong, etc. even took their identities.
"Dear" audience participation is very high, or a strong sense of substitution.
This is indeed a good thing, and the critics and the media gave this film the same polarization!
Although there are more positive reviews than negative reviews, the same also shows that movies with sensitive themes are really not easy to shoot!
Film critic Zhang Hong gave "Dear" a star!
"After watching this movie, I have a few questions. Because there are these questions, I can only give one point. If there is a negative point, I will give a negative point because it is related to the bottom line of human nature.
First, in the film, Tian Peng can clearly communicate with adults. The child does not know the kidnapper and knows the situation of his parents. If such a child is tied back, doesn't the kidnapper's wife know that he was abducted? In addition, could this child completely forget his biological parents in such a short time? In the real photo that follows, the boy and his biological father are smiling brightly, obviously there is no gap. Therefore, from the perspective of the movie's setting, it is very blunt to say that Li Hongqin did not know.
Second, it is difficult to prove that Ji Fang was not abducted. A worker who had a good relationship with the abductor saw it? The problem is what exactly the worker saw, and did not give the real shots. It is also possible that Ji Fang was abducted and left on the construction site to create the illusion of abandoned babies. All of Li Hongqin's moral support lies in Ji Fang's being abandoned, but this bottom-line movie gives a very vague picture. She is dead, without any strong logical support or straightforward statement. If Ji Fang is likely to be abducted, then this movie has not kept the basic moral bottom line.
As the movie says: kidnapping is one of the most inhuman crimes. Please do not set up a whitewashing plot full of loopholes. The filmmakers in China like to use the vague official language, and this is also true in the big right and wrong. Anyway, if I don’t make it clear, I have no responsibility, and I’m afraid of taking responsibility and filming something that has social responsibility. the film? This action of the film is equivalent to pushing all the moral burdens to the audience, allowing the audience to identify themselves under unclear conditions. Of course, this identification is strongly induced by the film.
The same is true for Tian Peng. As long as the movie is given for a few minutes, no matter what time period Tian Peng first came to Li Hongqin’s house, explain clearly how the kidnapper deceived, and explain why Li Hongqin could believe such a big child. , Children who do not know her and her husband at all, and children who have memories of their own family, were born to her husband and other women. Naturally, moral problems can be eliminated. Why not, I don’t think the crew can identify the real situation, right?
As for the child’s two years at the kidnapper’s house, he forgot the part of his biological parents. Anyway, he bullied the child for being ignorant? 3 or 4 year old children forget their biological parents completely in two years, which can only be said to be a plot need. "