Chapter 874: .Negative public opinion

Why are so few people filming the subject of "Dear", and why are most of the shots made more derogatory than praise?
It is because of this subject that it is too sensitive.
It is easy to be said to be eating human blood buns, and in fact, it is true.
If it weren't for Huaxin and Wang Yifan's previous donations and donating all the box office of the film, "Dear" at this time, I am afraid that it would have been hacked into a piece of carbon.
Because of the abduction theme, no matter how you shoot it, it will not satisfy everyone. Coupled with the sensitivity of this theme, it is easy to be misinterpreted.
In fact, even if "Dear" has done so much work before, it is still unavoidable to be criticized by some people!
Because in the movie "Dear", an extremely sensitive topic is involved. Does the wife of a trafficker have the right to have children?
From a moral point of view, whether Li Hongqin knew it or didn't know it, she was always the wife of a trafficker. There is no doubt about this.
Although from a legal point of view, there is no longer any affiliation, but in fact, privately, the moral level is still unavoidable.
Therefore, no matter how you justify it, Li Hongqin is still criticized by many people.
A more objective person might say that Li Hongqin is the only warm color in the film.
Because she treats children who are not her own, and is no worse than her own.
This again involves a nurturing grace, but this has a premise, that is, Li Hongqin must be an unaware person.
However, in the film, there is no clear explanation.
Does Li Hongqin really know nothing?
Many people expressed doubts. First of all, when Peng Peng was abducted, he was already able to speak. Then he was taken away by a trafficker and fell to Li Hongqin. Will he cry or not? Not looking for mom and dad?
This is obviously impossible. In fact, this can also be said to be a huge bug in the movie.
As for Li Hongqin, first of all, she must have known that Pengpeng was not born with him. This was enough.
Then, how did Pengpeng come here? Did she not delve into it?
In this regard, some people began to clamor, "Dear" portrays Li Hongqin in this way, is it suspected of beautifying human traffickers?
On the Internet, a post from an author who claimed to be "an ordinary mother" read: "After watching "Dear", first of all pay tribute to the director, actors and all staff of the crew! This is indeed a good one. The film starts crying from entering the theater to the end! The acting skills are in place!
But as a mother I am deeply angry about this movie! Because the scenes of sympathy for Li Hongqin, the human trafficker's wife, in the film are simply outrageous.
I even read the comments of some netizens on the Internet, saying that Li Hongqin is the only warm color in the film. I can’t understand that the wife of a human trafficker and the two children are not biological. Pengpeng is Tian Wenjun and Lu Xiaojuan. Child, how about Ji Fang? Who are her parents? Was she also trafficked?
This movie simply promotes that we should treat these "poor" traffickers who are infertile but want to have children, so that we can't blame them, but also sympathize with them and be kind to them and appreciate them.
Thank the traffickers for kidnapping your child and helping you raise your child! Thank the traffickers for kidnapping your child just out of need of a child and not for money! !
I really don't understand, shouldn't traffickers be severely punished? In ancient times, the serious crime was to punish the nine races. If the husband who kidnapped the child died and his wife was innocent? correct? Just be sympathetic!
Do you think that in the future, the traffickers will all put on a bitter drama, with tears and nasal tears, saying, ‘I can’t give birth to a kid, I picked it up and raised it, I don’t know anything, he is my son! ’
The laws of the country always blind the dignity rights of some ‘weakness’ and ‘sympathy’ to the law. If we do not fundamentally reform, I believe this kind of tragedy will repeat itself! "
This kind of condemning remarks standing on the moral high ground made all fans who support "Dear" speechless for a while...
In fact?
This kind of problem is really hard to argue clearly.
In fact, when this story was written by Wang Yifan, Wang Yifan also thought about whether this part of the content should be removed.
To be honest, Wang Yifan himself actually has very complicated senses for the role of Li Hongqin.
Of course, this is a movie, not a fact.
And the fact is, the problem with the wife of a trafficker.
Just like the author of that post said, on the moral level, Li Hongqin's husband is a human trafficker, so does she deserve to be cast aside?
But what if Li Hongqin really didn't know it?
So how should this problem be explained?
From a purely "person" standpoint, does Li Hongqin have the qualifications to have children? Do you have the right to be a mother?
Obviously, she does!
In fact, the movie itself does not have this tendency, and what the movie shows, in fact, does not mean to beautify the traffickers.
Li Hongqin's existence is itself a contradictory complex. She is the wife of a human trafficker, but at the same time her love for Ji Fang and Peng Peng's two children is also real.
Of course, the influence of public opinion in this direction is still relatively small.
Because everyone with a brain knows that "Dear" cannot really beautify human traffickers.
There are certainly not many people who have actually watched a movie.
After all, Huaxin spent so much money, "Dear" involved another kidnapping, they didn't charge a cent, and they helped parents who lost their children find children.
What is the picture?
In other words, beautifying human traffickers has no position and is unreasonable for them.
Therefore, such remarks have always been said by a small group of people.
Most people still have a good impression of "Dear".
And "Dear" box office results are also quite good.
It can even be said that it was a little unexpected. After the "Dear" movie was released, the box office received more than 100 million yuan in the first weekend three days!
Although compared with many commercial productions, this data is really not a little bit worse.
But you must know that this is not a commercial film, but a feature film, or even a relatively depressing film.
At this time, both Wang Yifan and Huaxin responded quickly and directly announced that they would donate the box office currently reported, yes, it was not about the net profit.
It can be said that the movie thing, if you really said that you donated the net profit, it would definitely be a lie.
Because the net profit can be written in spring and autumn, there is no problem in making losses.
But whether it is Wang Yifan or Huaxin, it is not short of money. Therefore, as soon as the box office data came out in the first weekend, 100 million box office was directly donated here.