Vol 3 Chapter 918: Russia withdraws from Syria

When Cai Ruichen returned to this world, he immediately heard the news that Russia was withdrawing troops from Syria.
At the moment when he heard the news, Cai Ruichen didn't feel strange at all.
Just as Russia had no signs at all, it suddenly sent troops to Syria, this time there was no sign at all, and suddenly it withdrew.
This has directly brought no small impact to the policy interests of all countries in the Middle East.
Just as the consequences of Russia’s sudden dispatch of troops to Syria at the beginning were similar, it had a huge impact on the Middle East and even Europe.
To see clearly the reason behind this incident, one has to stand beside the big chessboard of the world and watch how the chess players around the chessboard consider problems and make decisions.
At this moment, Cai Ruichen, although he is not qualified to be a direct player in this big chess game, he is already standing next to the current players, watching their thoughts at every step, and various considerations before each move.
Regarding the news of Russia's sudden withdrawal of troops, Cai Ruichen believes that all relevant news about the three countries of the European Union, Russia, and the United States have been collected in recent months.
Soon a reason why Russia wants to withdraw troops, Bian soon appeared.
There are three key pieces of news that are worthy of Cai Ruichen's attention.
News 1: The President of the United States said in an interview with The Atlantic Monthly, the world’s most famous international political newspaper:
The interests of Ukraine are not the core interests of the United States. The interests of Ukraine are the core interests of Russia.

In response to this passage, the Atlantic Monthly published a detailed analysis of tens of thousands of words. It not only listed all the political decisions since becoming president, but also analyzed in detail the thinking and style of the White House International Staff Team.
This article is a good description of all foreign policies since taking office. It focuses on all the contradictions between the United States and Russia on the Ukrainian issue.
News 2: In a recent speech, the spokesperson of the EU presidency officially stated that Ukraine should not even want to join the EU within 20 years. Not long after the news appeared, the spokesperson of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization also officially stated to the public that Ukraine should not even want to join NATO within 25 years.
Although these two news were sent by different organizations, the result is obvious, that is, Ukraine is completely tragedy.
Why did Ukraine feel that it was against Russia at the beginning, and why dared to jump in front of it? Isn't it because of some private hints or promises, it is more or less a promise to join the EU and NATO.
And if it weren't for joining the European Union and NATO, Ukraine would not have the guts to confront a neighboring country that can completely crush itself with military strength.
As a result, there has been no news about joining the European Union and NATO. As a result, Crimea disappeared and became Russian territory.
Civil war also broke out. It can be said that the people in the country have no livelihood. A good country becomes a war-torn country overnight.
The economy has receded, the international influence has been devastated, and Russia's natural gas supply has been lost.
If it can join the EU and NATO in this way, it may be worthwhile for the top Ukrainian leaders, but now, all hopes have vanished.
It can almost be said that Ukraine has been abandoned by the European Union and NATO, completely sacrificing all the hopes of the Ukrainian government.
Ukraine alone cannot stop the ferocious polar bear in Russia.
Combining the first news, although it was not said on a formal occasion, but saying that sentence in one of the most famous international political monthly magazines in the world, it almost warmed up the matter in advance. It is a very obvious political trend. .
After that, there were follow-up actions by the EU and NATO, and Ukraine was officially abandoned ruthlessly.
News 3: After these news appeared one after another, Russian officials also suddenly announced a news, that is to support Syria to establish a federal state.
The news of Russia did not appear. The first two pieces of news were purely foolish acts by NATO and the European Union, but as soon as this news appeared, many people immediately realized it.
Obviously, the interests of Syria and Ukraine have become a bargaining chip for the exchange of great powers.
Otherwise, why would the EU and NATO give up Ukraine's interests? If there is no corresponding interest to exchange, it is almost impossible.
And this is one of the interests of sending troops to Syria. On the issue of Ukraine, it is impossible for Russia to use its own national interests to trade with the United States. This is a traitorous business, and it is also a super-loss business. It is impossible for any superpower or even a major power to do so.
What to do?
A very effective method was used decisively ~EbookFREE.me~ that is to create a bargaining chip that can be used for trading at another conflict point.
This bargaining chip is the Assad regime in Syria. One of the most direct goals of sending troops is to help the Assad government consolidate its regime.
I have to say that Russia’s sudden troop deployment really shocked the whole world. There was no sign of it, and even the United States had no news from the beginning. They were all caught off guard by Russia's actions.
But Russia’s excuse for sending troops is very reasonable. The Syrian government’s invitation to Russia to fight against the national armed forces that everyone shouted at that time was very legal, and there was no reason for any country to interfere.
Although the United States is very clear that Russia came to Syria to support the Assad regime, the United States cannot stop it either.
After all, Russia’s dispatch of troops to combat extremist organizations is in full compliance with UN regulations. It was also invited on behalf of the Syrian government. It was not the turn of the United States to say that it disagreed.
Even if the United States says that it does not agree, it will not go to bird the Americans.
This plan obviously worked, and the Assad regime officially stabilized when Russian warplanes began to appear over Syria.
The Syrian civil war that has lasted for more than five years, by this time, the main goal of the United States, the goal of destroying the Assad regime, has almost failed.
When the United States fails, Saudi Arabia also fails, and other NATO countries also fail.
In five years, the Assad regime will still exist. Unless it sends troops directly to war with Russia, the Assad regime will still exist even after five years.
In the current situation in Syria, the bargaining chip needed has emerged, and it can be used, and that is the interests of Syria.