Chapter 1804: 16. No region exists (19)

Imperial thinking is an absolute rationalism where rationality is paramount.
Outsiders often criticize this mode of thinking, which excludes the most sensitive elements, to be ruthless and inhuman. When faced with such things as distribution of interests, political wrestling, and victory or defeat, everyone's performance is very practical. The Albians are known for their terrible reality. Seres is exquisite, and Lapland has long sleeves and good dancing. The Principality simply does not care about eating.
People may not be able to accept the imperial way of thinking emotionally, but no one can deny their theoretical correctness and effectiveness in solving problems.
This is the case in Marseille.
Although he has decided to part ways with the empire, once he encounters a problem, he is still used to suppressing and vacating his emotions, looking at the problem and himself from the perspective of a bystander.
Looking at this plan from the position of a third party, I am afraid that in addition to "crazy", "gambler", and "head fever", I am afraid that no other adjective can be thought of.
Marseille's military knowledge is limited. His insights on strategic and tactical issues can only be said to have a certain degree of common sense. It is not possible to delve into in-depth research, and there are few insightful insights. But he is well aware of the difference between "system" and "individual".
The empire's education system instilled hierarchical awareness and collectivism in citizens of all levels from childhood. "Individual power is insignificant, and collective power can cut mountains and fill the sea.", "Hierarchy is the best thing in the world, there is no order, no ups and downs, and society and the country will only collapse."-Grow in this social atmosphere In Marseille, it is clear how great a "system" has over an "individual".
Apply this kind of cognition to the military, that is, the confrontation between "system" and "single weapon system".
When talking about military topics, people like to compare the two weapons, and compare the basic performance parameters to evaluate the pros and cons of the weapons. This horizontal comparison is simple and easy to understand, and even ordinary people who are not professional or even amateurs can easily comment on it. But if a real military expert uses this method to compare and analyze the strength of the enemy and our opponents, it will not be a smirk, but will be directly dragged out and trampled to death.
The military itself is an extremely rigorous science. The more advanced the technology, the more expanded and complicated the equipment, organization, and logistics. The ancient kind of relying on the general's personal bravery and the glory of one or two military divisions to win a decisive battle and reverse the entire strategic situation in one fell swoop is destined to be impossible to reappear after entering the industrial era. Today's confrontation and even war is essentially confrontation between systems. That is, the confrontation between the comprehensive national strength between the countries, and the confrontation between the multi-arms combined combat system of the army. The impact of a single weapon's superiority and inferiority can produce the most confrontation with the grassroots units. The company level is the upper limit. It is impossible to affect the entire battle, let alone the overall strategy.
The battle is the same.
We are numerous, hence the name "Legion".
This is the source of the "Legion" name, and its huge number is the largest weapon, but few people notice, or few realize that it is built on the huge number and can adapt to various complex combat environments, enough to deal with The complete combat system of any enemy and strategy is an equally threatening advantage.
Except for very few special individuals, group operations have always been the basic strategy of the "Legion". Scouts, assault soldiers, artillery, air force, strategic strike forces, logistic support forces... all arms are available. With the huge base, tireless and fearless of death, it is not a problem to crush any army.
It is observed that the "legion" responsible for security and protection includes four types: early warning type, mayfly type, air combat type, and reconnaissance type. The security on the inside of the D line must be stricter. It is possible to configure special specifications including hunting type. Body. According to the worst scenario, the most powerful member of the Guards may also be responsible for guarding and annihilating evidence. From the standpoint of combat effectiveness alone, its actual combat capability is comparable to that of "legions" ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands.
In contrast, the "Freedom Legion" invested only one "Salamanda II" and dozens of elite combat forces. It also included all logistics support personnel, and more than 300 people were full. Quantity, system integrity, support and support capabilities, and comprehensive combat effectiveness-no matter what, the gap is so desperate.
Generally speaking, when faced with such a large gap, people's reaction will not be "can we win", but "is there still a need to fight?"
The answer is "of course."
There is no way to choose is one aspect, more importantly, it has great strategic significance.
Roland did not say what "great strategic significance" is, and based on the principle of confidentiality, no one asked. But judging from Roland's solemn expression at the time, that was no joke or whim.
That's an important content that is too important to mention even one word to anyone present.
I don’t know the content and there is no guarantee, everyone will be desperate for this.
But no one questioned or complained about it at the meeting.
why?
Is this consciousness? Is it dignity?
Just as Marseille was thinking, artificial intelligence came.
--caveat. There is an unstable electromagnetic signal that moves quickly. Based on the trajectory, the target is assumed to be the local machine.
-Can you determine the type and number of enemy aircraft?
The other party is preliminarily determined to be a stand-alone operation, which is affected by electromagnetic interference and unstable reflected signals.
Are there alternatives?
The thought of switching to the battle state is still indifferent. When asked, Marseille has listed a few possibilities.
Every alternate is trouble, and every one is terrible.
The answer given by artificial intelligence is not the worst one, but it is definitely the most troublesome and difficult.
Comparing the database, the probability of the other party being Salamanda III is as high as 83%.
########
"Preliminarily comparing the electromagnetic signal parameters, it is estimated that the probability of the enemy aircraft being'Salamanda II' is 96%."
"It's really a matter of chance. The sin that started from Rudes has continued to be entangled to this day. I think Marseille will feel the same way."
"The question is unclear and cannot be answered."
"Don't care, continue the original mission, search and destroy."
"To understanding."
Staring at the intermittent signal on the screen, Mach raised his mouth.
Will he meet someone who changes his destiny in the extreme north far away from the empire's native land. Is this a gift from the gods, or is it a favor of destiny that will give him a chance to make a decision?
Never mind.
It doesn't matter which kind.
Defeat and be ashamed;
Defeated and killed here;
It's not enemy death.
It was me who died.
"Notify the tactical calculation network and start the response plan No. 233."
"Comply."
In response to Case No. 233, on the premise of not affecting confidentiality and tasks, Sharamanda III Command Headquarters was granted level three field dispatch authority to centrally coordinate on-site combat power to eliminate suspicious targets.
In the blink of an eye, two thousand ephemeras and a squadron of air combats were brought under Mach’s command. The mechanical undead murmured as they followed the footsteps of Salamanda III into the faint faint light spot in the radar interface .