: As for preaching, say something that is always talked about.

What I wrote yesterday was very brainy, didn't sleep well, and wrote something before I filled it. ? w.suimeng.lā
One or two months ago, there was an interview, which said a question, the content is probably like this:
I wrote a little while studying in Luyuan. After a teacher read it, I asked: Why do you write the author of the net text? After self-examination, I found that when I was writing, I used to emphasize it, and traditional literature sought its right just right, because it was so beautiful.
I can't understand traditional literature, but I can still understand it, so I can see the reason for this difference: the audience reason. Readers who have been truly educated or systematically educated, in their hearts, many basic logics have been formed. To give a simple example, we say the concept of "group silence". Why does this concept come from? What, in the heart of the readers who truly accept the system education, only four words are needed. According to the principle of output, there are concerns and seriousness about "group silence". Perhaps this person's knowledge system has been feedback to him in an instant.
But most people in this society have not formed such a mechanism - I mean that more than 90% of the people in this society, even those who have studied at university, and even higher diplomas, have not formed this way. The mechanism, then, for the thoroughness and accuracy of the transmission, I have to explain the ins and outs of "group silence", so that people not only see a seemingly cool noun, but really understand What it means.
Another example is the same complex and profound masterpieces full of social metaphors. For example, people with perfect logical systems can see the irony and revealing of them. Most people will only see "the road sees a slap in the face!" "Brothers loyalty" "Big meat bowls, drinking, and killing people!"
Enlightenment articles should clarify its directionality, which is what I understand after I have seen these. Among the readers I am facing, there are not many people who are not profoundly profound, but there are many. However, based on the current culture and education system of the society, there are many people with defects and one-sided problems in the personal thinking system.
This problem is very complicated. For example, to truly understand it at the literary or philosophical level requires a complete set of cultural training. In ancient times, this training was there and directed. Modernity is gone, because culture collapses, the chain of cultural collapse has caused the country to not clearly define what needs to be created, the state cannot be clear, education cannot have goals, and when education has no goals, the education system can only use all the things that may be useful. In front of you. So even if you have a book, even if you have gone through higher education, you will see a lot of thoughts. In the end, what kind of education direction is based on modernity is "right". We don't know, we don't dare to draw conclusions easily, but there is no direction, it must be "wrong." Some people will say that this is freedom, this is diversity, but it is not, why not, and I am not going to explain it here.
I seem to explain a lot of things in the book, such as "the world is not benevolent". This is a deep and shallow concept in ancient times. It is because everyone is avoiding it. It is because it is not difficult to understand correctly after professional training. . But after understanding it, you will find that without understanding, they understand it is more troublesome. In ancient times, people were weak and ignorant, and they were right.
Modern is different.
After the existence of human rights, democracy is a big concept and a general trend. Many fool elites say it better than anything else. In fact, democracy is the ancient gentleman's way. When you understand logic, discernment, selfishness, and autonomy, that is true democracy. If the people want to be independent, they will have to open up the wisdom of the people. What are the requirements of the people's wisdom? Human society is like a ship sailing in a sea full of reefs. Without a map, it used to be the best person at the helm, trembled, a mistake, stunned, and the dead died in the millions . In the future, everyone will be at the helm, and its requirements will be imagined by everyone. If it is China's current situation, you said that the national affairs should let the people around you vote, I am still immigrating, immigration to the United States is not safe, at least have to go to Mars.
However, when human rights are becoming more and more important, people are getting more and more attention. Letting you vote for this matter is really possible. It will symbolize you suddenly at the beginning. Later, you may really decide what to order.
Qi Minzhi, mentioned in the May Fourth period, later, no one said, no one did. This has objective reasons. In the past 30 years, reform and opening up have been carried out. The original existence is the cultural system used to hold spiritual civilization. It has not played any role, because it has long since been ruined.
When talking about literature in Luyuan, the teacher said: "There are many people around me who have been sticking to it." Sticking is very valuable, but in the final analysis, culture since ancient times is an elite culture, and elite culture is to worship people. For example, in colleges, we say that there is no direction in university education, but knowledge has always been. If you are a self-conscious person, you can learn something very deep. On the contrary, if you are not conscious, you will get nothing and make a difference. This conscious, where does it come from?
When thirty years have persisted and there is no real meaning, has anyone tried to kneel down? Trying to dig through the guidance? After all, the basic foundation of literacy has finally been laid.
My readers, or readers of the net text, are at the bottom of the society - please understand that the bottom layer I am talking about is not a contempt, because I am also - read a book, but there is no reason to go any further. Moving bricks, looking at nine-to-five civil servants, marrying people, the above people said that this is very superficial. At the spiritual level, this is indeed a low-level spiritual realm. However, is it blaming these people?
If you want to be in a society full of and capital, pull the social level and the pursuit of it, and do it realistically and pragmatically. Oh, on the above, "I am stuck," is it really all the power? Looking at it with cold eyes and criticizing it, is it enough to feel your superiority?
There was such a dialogue during the interview.
Q: "Is that yy and cool as a means of establishing people for you? Is it a method of teaching and learning?"
"Well, it is a very necessary means. At this stage, it is not as light or even more important than elegant art."

Do you kill time efficiently for readers?


No, it is to output values ​​efficiently.

When our readers are filled with 100% of the hearts, we talk about 100% spiritual pursuit, meaningless, fit 90%, say 10% of the pursuit, can effectively send people To a better place. I will send a ride and let the next person send it.
What I am facing is a reader with basic basic attributes. Many friends are willing to explore these things, they will be inspired by these things, and then they become less extreme - this is actually the way I have traveled. Before that, I have been involved in large-scale discussions. For example, at the end of the fifth episode and many places, some readers have certain literary connotations. Seeing these, you actually destroy the aesthetic requirements of traditional literature, and even destroy it. The integrity of the work, in fact, I said it again and again a long time ago, this is the balance I chose.
Why can't you understand: In fact, I understand very well that these pages have destroyed the integrity of the work?
Even if the integrity of the work is destroyed, I have to highlight them. Another reason is that the rude means of destroying the integrity of the work can highlight them more clearly.
I wrote a very telling book, saying that it can even be literary. If I draw people in, I will give private goods rudely, but it is also the result of hundreds of thousands of thoughts. I used to say that if you don't like it, you can jump, but you can't bear it. If you can't stand it, you can abandon it. I actually talked about it more than once.
After each large-scale statement, people came out to post articles and state some basic concepts of literature. I can understand the meaning of the boxing in the middle, but I don’t like these things. In the final analysis, it is an experimental text from my point of view. It is to try to experiment with things that can't be done in high literature. We try to kneel down and let people step on it. Because it is an experimental text, it can't be conclusive. I have repeatedly played countless times. The basic concept of literature is the starting point of this deduction. You think that what you want to teach me, I have already broken it up and broken it and watched it many times. But when you mention it, it will still consume my spirit and time.
It’s as if we have determined the basic attitude of doing things, and determined that after starting the work with the most rigorous attitude~EbookFREE.me~ Someone keeps popping up and keep saying:
How do you know you are right?
That is a waste of time.
I hope that after this, no one will talk to me about the foundation of traditional literature. After writing, we can judge its merits and demerits.
......
In addition, in fact, I did not think about the high point of traditional literature. I advocate traditional literature because traditional literature expresses the meaning of anything. Its methods have been studied to the extreme. I am afraid that economic networking is like online literature. Like the invasion of the Eight-Power Allied Forces, traditional literature has been defeated, and these good techniques have been lost.
However, the literature of the future cannot be high. It is not a that hangs on the spire of the tower. It should be a ladder itself, let the human society step on it and see the scenery on the spire.
The essence of human creation culture is to explore and enhance the spiritual realm of the self. Any culture that does not aim at promoting human society, with or without, does not matter.
The brain is running away, writing too much - originally these are things to be written in the postscript. Well, I am going to make up my sleep. Yes, in the last half day, even if the single chapter is a ticket, is it good ^_^